Skip to main content
Tag

data analytics Archives - Pinnacle III

ASC billing office process improvement

ASC Billing Office Process Improvement – Conducting a Quarterly Review

By ASC Management, Leadership, Revenue Cycle Management No Comments

The saying goes, “Old habits die hard.” But in the ASC billing office, repeating the same mistakes costs time, money, and resources. Hence, the process of identifying process inefficiencies and areas of improvement is a constant responsibility for an effective ASC billing office. It is generally good practice to conduct a complete billing office process improvement evaluation and plan implementation at the end of each financial quarter. At the close of a quarter, there is enough data to review, identify, and correct negative trends. The start of a new quarter provides a clean slate for tracking the impact of the changes three months from now.

Where to begin?

Start by identifying your weaknesses by analyzing available data. This data can come from your patient accounting system and/or clearinghouse. Error tracking allows you to quantify mistakes that prevent clean claims. Reviewing clearinghouse rejection reports may identify trends. If you regularly find the same rejections, log the incidence as well as the resolution changes you make to help you identify and correct the issue. It may also be beneficial to review adjustment journal codes and ensure they meet your tracking needs in case you need to analyze payment or adjustment trends. These metrics can help you identify training opportunities for your staff at all stages of your billing cycle.

Collaboration

In an efficient billing office, a system of checks and balances establishes itself when billing tasks are departmentalized. The schedulers provide the patient and billing information, verification confirms the feasibility of the case under the provided circumstances, coders translate the visit for delivery to the insurance carrier, data entry qualifies the billing information, and accounts receivable ensures maximum reimbursement for the team’s efforts. Each subsequent person that handles the information relies on the previous person’s understanding of healthcare billing. Every individual’s work is verified, but not repeated, in the next step in the process. When each of these groups of people are housed in the same location, collaboration is as simple as looking over the cubicle wall. If your ASC billing office is off-site, the frequency and timeliness in which front office errors are communicated may impact the ASC billing office revenue cycle. It is important to have timely and frequent communication in this scenario.

Cross-train

Requests should not be put on hold when someone is out sick! Besides needing backup to cover absences, cross-training allows employees to understand how people in other roles manage their time and contribute to the success of the team. Transparency among departments and roles invites accountability. The quarterly billing office process improvement review is a perfect time to identify areas where cross-training is needed to fill gaps and/or back up a role.

Empower

A billing office’s process improvement plan success is dependent on the team’s commitment to the improvements. Encourage staff to participate and take charge of change. They perform the tasks that bring the money in the door. Policies and procedures sound good on paper, but execution can reveal unexpected roadblocks. Your team has ideas of how to prevent issues and improve the process. Implement the solutions that will work best for your team and your center.

Re-evaluate

CMS guidelines, fee schedules, CPT/ICD-10/HCPCS codes, pre-certification lists, and coverage policies – this information changes monthly, quarterly, annually. Subscribe to insurance company newsletters and follow medical societies, revenue cycle resources, and vendors. Assign someone to distribute beneficial information to affected groups of people. This may include surgeons, their billing office, facility administrators, and insurance verification specialists, in addition to your own revenue cycle team. The information released may force you to take yet another look at your revenue cycle needs and adjust as necessary!

Summary of Tips for ASC Billing Office Process Improvement

Make it regular. ASC billing office process improvement review should take place on a regular basis, whether conducted monthly, quarterly, or on another schedule.

Review the data. Reviewing rejected claims logs and other data allows you to identify trends and billing office inefficiencies.

Promote team collaboration. Billing office roles will naturally back each other up when operating in sync with collaboration.

Incorporate occasional cross-training. A fresh set of eyes can provide valuable insight into simple changes that can increase efficiency or reduce errors.

Don’t leave out clinical roles. They have valuable insights that can affect coding and thus reimbursement. Evaluate the use of expensive implants and supplies to ensure you are billing and collecting as your contracts allow.

Re-evaluate and update regulatory information. It is crucial to the essential function of the ASC billing office to maintain accurate and up-to-date records when it comes to CMS guidelines, fee schedules, CPT/ICD-10/HCPCS codes, pre-certification lists, and coverage policies. This should also be a part of the regular ASC billing office process improvement review.

The only constant in the healthcare industry is change. When so many professionals rely on your office for the financial deliverables of their organization, as in the ASC billing office, it is imperative to stay up-to-date with industry changes. Regular review of your internal processes is the best way to keep up.


Bethany Bueno, Director of Billing Operations

ASC Case-Costing: Improving the Data Collection Process

ASC Case-Costing: Improving the Data Collection Process

By ASC Management, Leadership No Comments

For an ASC leader, understanding the financial impact of each surgery performed in an ASC is critical to the facility’s success. To achieve this, you must have detailed, accurate data on surgical costs and reimbursements.

Most facilities have software that produces reports which assist with gathering and modeling data. Depending on the resources available at your facility, the difficulty in gathering and using case-costing data will vary.

Avoiding ‘bad’ data

Some management companies, like Pinnacle III, employ a data analyst to provide tools to analyze the cost and reimbursement of cases. However, even with the help of a data analyst, the analysis will only be helpful if the data collection process is accurate and thorough. A common saying among data scientists is, “Garbage in equals garbage out.” For ASCs, if the person pulling the data does not have accurate data to work with, case-costing will be inaccurate.

Here are a few ways to avoid producing bad data.

  • Ensure staff are entering valid data into your software and paying attention to details. Educating staff about the impact of their role in this process is key. Staff mistakes, such as entering equipment cost as supply, can falsely inflate the cost of the case in your analysis. These mistakes are easily avoided by focused staff members who have received adequate training on their function and impact.
  • Update staff compensation. If pay rates aren’t current in your software, the labor costs associated with a case will be incorrect.
  • Engage your materials personnel. The material personnel are vital to keeping information current and accurate. Supply pricing changes must be up-to-date in your software.
  • Keep preference cards current. Make sure hold items are not listed as open. Ensure standard items used on every surgery are correct. This will avoid waste and reduce errors when accounting for what was used during each surgery.
  • Don’t forget supplies used outside of the OR. The supplies used in pre-op and PACU for a patient can seem insignificant. However, accounting for them with the surgery ensures general supply expenses spread among all cases is reduced. Create a pre/post bundle price for each type of surgery that gets added to the supply used. And don’t forget to include anesthesia supplies and drugs, which are often overlooked.
  • Include everything with a fee. Often there will be a charge for something, such as rental for a laser or a tray drop-off, that can be easily left out. If certain items are always used and the fee is known, add them to the preference card and include the fee in your software. Educate staff to facilitate understanding about which items carry a fee to ensure those costs are added to the case.
  • Accurately capture implants and instrumentation. Avoid including reprocessed items as an expense. Ensure fees are not attached to reprocessed instruments or they could be charged to the case as a supply used. Ensure implants used are reflected in your software with the appropriate price.

Final tips for case-costing analysis

There are obvious costs to capture, however, some items may be overlooked, particularly if you are not utilizing a data analyst. Some things to remember when gathering case-costing data are:

  • Include total visit time as well as OR time. The length of time the patient spends in the facility from admission to discharge is an important factor in the overall cost of a case.
  • Use your P&L to tie-in general expenses to be allocated among all cases as an indirect expense.
  • Include the payor mix. This is very important as the payor mix can be a contributing factor to variances among surgeons.
  • There is never too much detail. The process is tedious, but the result will benefit the ASC in many ways. The more ways the data can be sorted, the easier it will be to identify inefficiencies, waste, spending variances, long recoveries, and a variety of trends.
  • Separate supplies and implants. This will allow you to compare surgeons by case and identify opportunities for savings and standardization.

Once the data is gathered, configure it in a way that will allow you to study it from multiple angles (e.g., via a spreadsheet program). Begin with a broad view – by specialty, physician, CPT, or payor, for example. Then examine the subsets – perhaps by specialty/by physician or by physician/by CPT. If you notice significant variances, dig deeper to determine the cause. As you study the data you may find errors. Rather than being frustrated by inaccuracies, use errors as an opportunity to refine your processes and/or systems. Avoid sharing data with your surgeons until you are confident it is accurate. Seek their insights when sharing the information; they may be able to point to additional areas to investigate prior to making operational decisions based on the data.

As you refine your processes and systems, keep your staff and surgeons in the feedback loop. Addressing errors as they arise will create a more seamless process that allows you to focus on other improvement opportunities.

Stay tuned for the second-part of my case-costing blog series. In my follow-up blog, I will further discuss best-practices for analyzing case-costing data. I will also delve into ways to utilize case-costing data, and the benefit of engaging surgeons in the process.


Lori Tamburo, Director of Operations